************************
Would you check your real knowledge of Jerusalem History & Archaeology, with the following, very simple, Scholarly Quiz :
{ If you do not know the Answers (including Dan Bahat complex Question n°4 ) we can provide some below >>> }
*************************************************************
Question n°1 :
Why 98% of the reconstructions of the Herodian Temple by models, paintings, drawings, diagrams, etc (including those in Israel Museum) do not show the Priestly Annex building which was attached around and against the walls of the Temple, on its sides and at its back (in conformity with the sacred model of the Temple of Solomon) ?
- According to Flavius Josephus* and to Tractate Middoth** this Annex was 20 meters high (the Temple being 50 meters high) and 13 meters large : As the Temple was 10 meters large, this means that these Priestly Annexes on each side of the Temple, were larger than the Temple. –
* Flavius Josephus : Jewish historian of a Priestly family, and eyewitness of the destruction of the Herodian Temple by Titus.
** Tractate Middoth (Measures) of Qodachim Order (Holy Things) of the Mishnah describes and measures in details the architecture of the Herodian Temple.
***
Question n°2 :
Why Scholars, Rabbis, Archaeologists, Historians, Politicians, Professors, Encyclopedias, Wikipedias, Medias, etc, unanimously persist in the error to call the Temple of Herod “the second Temple”, and pretend that Herod had simply decorated and embellished an existing second Hasmonean Temple ?
- Although Flavius Josephus states very precisely that Herod did destroy completely (including its foundations) the second Temple which had been built by Zurubbabel and Yeshua on their return from exile in Babylonia, and which later had been embellished by the Hasmoneans.
Jewish Antiquities : 15 : 11 :
“So (after having demolished the whole Edifice) Herod removed all the old foundations, and laid others, and erected the Temple upon them.”
This total destruction of the second Temple is furthermore corroborated by Aggadic (legendary) accounts in the Talmud, as for example,
Talmud of Babylon : Order Neziqin : Tractate Baba Bathra : 3b :
“How could Baba ben Buta counsel Herod to demolish the Temple for the purpose of building a new one ? Was this not against the Law ?”...
And : (Baba ben Buta and Herod’s discussion about the demolition and rebuilding of the Temple :)
Baba ben Buta replied then to Herod :
“Send a Messenger to Rome for which it shall take a year until he shall reach there, and let him remain there a year, and his returning shall also take a year : and during these three years you can demolish this Temple and build a new one.” –
***
Therefore, Herod’s Temple was the third Temple of Jerusalem, and the next one will be the fourth Temple of Jerusalem.
***
Question n°3 :
Why did some Rabbis edict an “Halakha” (Religious Law) forbidding Jews to go where they (wrongly = see below) believe is their Temple Mount ?
On this, altogether sensitive and absurd problem, one should usefully recall the Travel Diary of Maimonides (Rambam: Rabbi Moisha ben Maimon) who is one of the main founders of the “Halakha” architecture)
Maimonides went to Jerusalem in 1165. It happened that, at that time, Jerusalem was a Christian Kingdom, and it appeared also that the Crusaders were more tolerant than the Muslims : Therefore the Jews were plainly allowed to come pray on what they believed to be their Temple Mount, and Maimonides could thus enjoy the bliss to pray on what he believed to be the Temple Mount.
Maimonides : Travel Diary Jerusalem –Hebron : 16 October 1165 :
“And I entered the Place of Great and Holy House, and prayed there on the fifth day of the week, the sixth day of the month Marchshwan.”
Furthermore, in his Code : Book of the Service of the Temple 30 , Maimonides indicates that it is a duty to go pray on the “Temple Mount”.
But, in Maimonides’ time, Muslims could not forbid Jews to come on the so called “Temple Mount” …
***
Question n°4 : ( this Question n°4 is in fact a complement to Question n °1 )
Why the drawings of the reconstruction of the Herodian Temple by Dan Bahat* and Leen Ritmeyer** do not show the Priestly Annex at the back of the Herodian Temple, whereas they show this same Priestly Annex on the sides of the Herodian Temple ?
* Dan Bahat : “Jerusalem Antiquities Official Expert”
** Leen Ritmeyer : “Temple Expert”
***
Would you check your real knowledge of Jerusalem History & Archaeology, with the following, very simple, Scholarly Quiz :
{ If you do not know the Answers (including Dan Bahat complex Question n°4 ) we can provide some below >>> }
*************************************************************
Question n°1 :
Why 98% of the reconstructions of the Herodian Temple by models, paintings, drawings, diagrams, etc (including those in Israel Museum) do not show the Priestly Annex building which was attached around and against the walls of the Temple, on its sides and at its back (in conformity with the sacred model of the Temple of Solomon) ?
- According to Flavius Josephus* and to Tractate Middoth** this Annex was 20 meters high (the Temple being 50 meters high) and 13 meters large : As the Temple was 10 meters large, this means that these Priestly Annexes on each side of the Temple, were larger than the Temple. –
* Flavius Josephus : Jewish historian of a Priestly family, and eyewitness of the destruction of the Herodian Temple by Titus.
** Tractate Middoth (Measures) of Qodachim Order (Holy Things) of the Mishnah describes and measures in details the architecture of the Herodian Temple.
***
Question n°2 :
Why Scholars, Rabbis, Archaeologists, Historians, Politicians, Professors, Encyclopedias, Wikipedias, Medias, etc, unanimously persist in the error to call the Temple of Herod “the second Temple”, and pretend that Herod had simply decorated and embellished an existing second Hasmonean Temple ?
- Although Flavius Josephus states very precisely that Herod did destroy completely (including its foundations) the second Temple which had been built by Zurubbabel and Yeshua on their return from exile in Babylonia, and which later had been embellished by the Hasmoneans.
Jewish Antiquities : 15 : 11 :
“So (after having demolished the whole Edifice) Herod removed all the old foundations, and laid others, and erected the Temple upon them.”
This total destruction of the second Temple is furthermore corroborated by Aggadic (legendary) accounts in the Talmud, as for example,
Talmud of Babylon : Order Neziqin : Tractate Baba Bathra : 3b :
“How could Baba ben Buta counsel Herod to demolish the Temple for the purpose of building a new one ? Was this not against the Law ?”...
And : (Baba ben Buta and Herod’s discussion about the demolition and rebuilding of the Temple :)
Baba ben Buta replied then to Herod :
“Send a Messenger to Rome for which it shall take a year until he shall reach there, and let him remain there a year, and his returning shall also take a year : and during these three years you can demolish this Temple and build a new one.” –
***
Therefore, Herod’s Temple was the third Temple of Jerusalem, and the next one will be the fourth Temple of Jerusalem.
***
Question n°3 :
Why did some Rabbis edict an “Halakha” (Religious Law) forbidding Jews to go where they (wrongly = see below) believe is their Temple Mount ?
On this, altogether sensitive and absurd problem, one should usefully recall the Travel Diary of Maimonides (Rambam: Rabbi Moisha ben Maimon) who is one of the main founders of the “Halakha” architecture)
Maimonides went to Jerusalem in 1165. It happened that, at that time, Jerusalem was a Christian Kingdom, and it appeared also that the Crusaders were more tolerant than the Muslims : Therefore the Jews were plainly allowed to come pray on what they believed to be their Temple Mount, and Maimonides could thus enjoy the bliss to pray on what he believed to be the Temple Mount.
Maimonides : Travel Diary Jerusalem –Hebron : 16 October 1165 :
“And I entered the Place of Great and Holy House, and prayed there on the fifth day of the week, the sixth day of the month Marchshwan.”
Furthermore, in his Code : Book of the Service of the Temple 30 , Maimonides indicates that it is a duty to go pray on the “Temple Mount”.
But, in Maimonides’ time, Muslims could not forbid Jews to come on the so called “Temple Mount” …
***
Question n°4 : ( this Question n°4 is in fact a complement to Question n °1 )
Why the drawings of the reconstruction of the Herodian Temple by Dan Bahat* and Leen Ritmeyer** do not show the Priestly Annex at the back of the Herodian Temple, whereas they show this same Priestly Annex on the sides of the Herodian Temple ?
* Dan Bahat : “Jerusalem Antiquities Official Expert”
** Leen Ritmeyer : “Temple Expert”
***
************************************************************
ANSWER 1 to Question n°1 :
This is the consequence of a deep ignorance of the Jewish essence which is often scholarly hidden by algorithmic erudition.
ANSWER 2 to Question n°2 :
This is the inevitable result of the ready-made lemmings (“moutons de Panurge”) twittered but well established Culture.
ANSWER 3 to Question n°3 :
These are the devastating effects of a millenial mental dhimmitude trapped in the absolute certitude of a scheming topographic mirage offered by a wrong “Temple Mount” (see a summarized explanation below).
ANSWER 4 to Question n°4 :
Dan Bahat is, inter alia, the author of the most renowned and successful reference “Illustrated Atlas of Jerusalem”.
This Atlas presents a rich abundance of drawings, maps, plans, diagrams, paintings, photographs, etc., in an effort to offer a visual demonstration, as exhaustive as possible, of Jerusalem History.
Now, you can search desperately this Jerusalem Atlas, you will not find a single drawing of a reconstruction of the Temple of Solomon, although this first Temple was, and is forever, the irradiating and founding core of Jerusalem history, legitimacy and destiny.
But you will be able to find in this same Atlas, drawings of Pagan Temples in the time of Solomon, and, for example the reconstruction of the “impressive” entrance to the Syrian Tell Ta’yinat Temple : Dan Bahat hinting surreptitiously, at a Syrian influence on the architecture of the Jewish Temple.
On this precise example, Dan Bahat makes a plain error (among others distributed all over his Book) :
- Yes, there was clearly a Syrian influence on the architects of the Solomon Temple : the proof of which can be found, not in the Tell Ta’yinat Temple, but in the Ain Dara Temple, which had a Priestly Annex attached against the external walls, all around the Pagan Temple, on its sides and at its back, and which had two basalt columns supporting the Porch.
Now, these two Syrian characteristics were effectively added by Solomon to the sacred model of the Tent of the Meeting of Moses, when Solomon built the first Temple of Jerusalem, while faithfully respecting the Bible divine proportions of the Jewish Sanctuary itself (with the perfect cube of the Holy of Hollies) –
Those Biblical, sacred proportions which constitute the Fundamentals of the Mystical Architecture of Jerusalem and of its Temple, are also totally ignored by Dan Bahat’s Illustrated Atlas of Jerusalem :
We do not want to make a complete book review of Dan Bahat’s, quasi-official Atlas of Jerusalem : that would be rather sad.
But we must add another final remark :
Dan Bahat presents many clever and luxury reconstruction drawings of the ancient sophisticated waters installations in antique Jerusalem.
But, here again, you can vainly scrutinize the Atlas, you will not find a single word about the functioning of the Hydraulic System of the Temple, without which the daily Worship (through the source living waters purifications required by Biblical Prescriptions) would have been totally impossible in the Temple of Jerusalem.
Dan Bahat avoids cautiously to even trying a reconstruction of this Religious Temple Hydraulic System, although this innovative System was absolutely unique in Antiquity, and at the core of all the Jewish rites in Jerusalem.
To conclude briefly with Dan Bahat, and to answer precisely Question n°4, the absence of the Priestly Annex at the back of the Temple, in his reconstruction of the Herodian Temple, is a deliberate twist to historic reality, in order to assimilate artificially the western wall of the disappeared Temple to the western Rampart of the Haram, called “Wailing Wall”.
This is not History and this is not Archaeology :
This is to manipulate in order to enforce a dhimmi tradition which had tolerated submissive Jews and Rabbis to pray at the wrong place, at the feet of the Muslims, and in the wrong axis (west-east instead of east-west, as explicitly prescribed by the Torah) :
Wrong place, because a few meters under the ground where the Jews stand at this “wailing wall”, runs the ancient aqueduct in which flowed the source living waters from Etam, providing, by sole gravitation and without the use of any bucket or utensil, the necessary and uninterrupted flux of purification live waters to downstream (among others) the brazen Laver (for purification of the Priests) and to the Mikveh of the High Priest, which was located at the upper storey of the Parvah House standing very close to the Temple, forcibly south and downstream from the “Haram”, on the real surface of the disappeared Sanctuary Platform !!!
To summarize our answer to Question n°4 , when being examined in details, the work of Dan Bahat appears similar to the various items presented by communist countries when they deal with Religious antiquities :
That is to say that Religion is systematically decerebrated and eviscerated to be turned into pseudo cultural and touristic profitable products.
Unfortunately, for the moment (but not for long), Israel’s Archaeology Nomenklatura diffuses complacently this lucrative state of mind.
But NOBODY in the world (including Dan Bahat) would have ever heard of a little town called JERUSALEM, if David had not brought there the Ark of the Covenant, and if Solomon had not built there the Temple of the Jews - TEMPLE of JERUSALEM ever fathering Democracy to Humanity through its indissociable infra-moral twins, called “Human Rights” and “Human Duties”.
Historically, Dan Bahat and consorts prefer to accept slavishly Hadrian’s destructive scheme :
In 135, this Roman Emperor, crushed in flows of blood the last revolt of the Jews led by Bar Kockba and Rabbi Akiba (the main architect of the Mishnah) in their despaired attempt to rebuild the Temple of Jerusalem destroyed by Titus in 70. After that, Hadrian banned from Jerusalem the Jews and the Christian Jews (for two centuries) in order to remove from mankind’s memory the real location of the completely erased platform on which the vanished Temple of the irreducible Jews had really stood - beneath the protection of the antique overlooking and continuously fortified Jewish Citadel (nowadays ‘’Haram’’).
Of course, after having so obediently operated on Israel a similar archaeology lobotomy, Dan Bahat and consorts are no more able to grasp the innovating Roots of the Jewish Essence, Truth and Legitimacy.
However, in the end, and despite Dan Bahat and consorts’ noxious ignorance :
- in the same way as they finally reacted to pogroms and holocausts by unexpectedly (after two thousands years) deciding to recreate the antique State of Israel with "settlers" (consciously or unconsciously driven by the Torah),
- in the same way, the Jews, wary of lamenting dhimmily at the wailing wall and at the foot of the “Haram”, will finally and unexpectedly (after two thousands years) decide to recreate and restore their necessary 4th TEMPLE of JERUSALEM on its authentic Site (which stood downstream from the “Haram” -as it had been indicated to David by THE ETERNAL G*D Himself-) : Glorious Temple which will, then, stand as their sole undisputable Legitimacy and Shield to withstand victoriously the growing environmental threat of annihilation, by perpetually offering to Humanity the living Democracy reference Source of the World essential and vital Moral Infrastructure.
***To conclude with this Op-ed, we would add that it proceeds from a quite bizarre state of mind to think that Mystical Certitudes cannot be studied and analyzed, especially when these mystical certitudes result from the initial Hadrian's destructive and Machiavellian scheme, his cold manipulation and his ruthless thirst for world absolute power.
Natan* November 2009
*Natan is the Author of “The Real History of the Temple of Jerusalem”
{= On-line at : http://www.jerusalem-4thtemple.org/ }
*Natan is the Head of THE NATAN FOUNDATION FOR THE RESTORATION OF THE TEMPLE OF JERUSALEM ON ITS AUTHENTIC SITE (downstream from the “Haram”, as authentified by Natan’s exclusive Study of the Temple Ancient Hydraulic System which has been faithfully preserved up today in the bedrock of the “Haram”)
{=On-line at : http://www.jerusalem-4thtemple.org/ }
*and the Author of “How to win the Ideology War against Islamic Suicide Terrorism”
(-without wasting stupidly Billions of Dollars and many lives-)
{= On-line at : ideology-war-observatory.blogspot.com }
*************************************************************************